Should power be limited to the sunlight incident on the CELSS footprint?
insolation on Earth is around 500 W/m2 (this varies by as much as plus or minus 100W/m2 depending on latitude and Milankovic cycle).
If the power used by the CELSS exceeds this amount then it can be argued that nature is more efficient than that CELSS design, and the CELSS is detracting from the Earth's biosphere.
It seems to me a good measure of the overall efficiency of the CELSS is how much power consumed per square meter of ground it takes up. For reference, the peak amount of
If the power used by the CELSS exceeds this amount then it can be argued that nature is more efficient than that CELSS design, and the CELSS is detracting from the Earth's biosphere.